Curricula
CIMER has developed 23 curricula to cover a wide range of disciplines and careers.
The CIMER base curricula include Entering Research, Entering Mentoring and Mentoring Up. Visit MyCIMER and create a free account to preview and download the curricula.
CIMER is currently updating our full curriculum library to make it digitally accessible. Several of our most frequently used mentor training curricula have been updated to be screen-reader-accessible (learn about the status of our updates). Our ongoing updates now also include adjustments to font and line spacing to make them more readable. If you would like an updated version of our curricula, or have another accessibility concern, please contact us.
MENTOR CURRICULA: Entering Mentoring
The curricula in the Entering Mentoring series are for mentors of research trainees. It was originally developed for mentors across science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) disciplines at different career stages, working with undergraduate and graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and junior faculty.
Our mentor training materials are designed for those who wish to implement process-based, professional development workshops for research mentors. You may choose one of our complete, pre-assembled curriculum packages or build your own customized curriculum to meet your needs.
The Entering Mentoring curricula series addresses the new NIGMS guidelines on preparing mentors involved in training grants.
Themes and Concepts:
- Aligning Expectations
- Articulating Your Mentoring Philosophy and Plan
- Assessing Understanding
- Cultivating Ethical Behavior
- Enhancing Work-Life Integration
- Fostering Independence
- Fostering Wellbeing
- Maintaining Effective Communication
- Promoting Mentee Research Self-Efficacy
- Promoting Professional Development
- Establishing a Practice of Inclusion
- Enhancing Cultural Awareness*
View the list of learning objectives from the curriculum. To access this module, please complete this application form.
MENTEE CURRICULA: Mentoring Up
Mentoring Up is an active learning approach designed for post-doctoral scholars and junior faculty to support the development of the skills needed to successfully navigate the research training environment and proactively manage their mentoring relationships. The curricula integrate topics from Entering Research and Entering Mentoring to develop mentoring skills. These curricula were originally developed for use with trainees across the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) disciplines. Read more about the training.
These curricula address important topics and concepts in research mentoring and training by creating learning communities and engaging post-doctoral scholars and junior faculty in activities, assignments, case studies, and facilitated discussions to solve mentoring dilemmas and share successful mentoring up strategies.
Themes and Concepts:
- Building Research Self-Efficacy
- Aligning Expectations
- Maintaining Effective Communication
- Establishing a Practice of Inclusion
- Enhancing Work-Life Integration*
- Achieving Independence
- Seeking Professional Development
*Unique to Junior Faculty Curriculum
MENTEE CURRICULA: Entering Research
The Entering Research conceptual framework, curriculum and assessment resources available through CIMER were developed at the Wisconsin Institute for Science Education and Community Engagement (WISCIENCE). Please visit the WISCIENCE website for the most up-to-date information.
The second edition of the Entering Research curriculum (Branchaw, Butz, and Smith, 2020) is a collection of nearly 100 evidence-based activities for undergraduate and graduate research trainees that can be mixed and matched to create new customized curricula. Alternatively, individual Entering Research activities can be integrated as needed into existing curricula for research training programs and courses.
The curricular activities are designed to create inclusive learning communities that structure the research experience, clarify behavioral and performance expectations, and develop the social and cultural capital trainees need to successfully navigate the research environment. Each activity is aligned to the Entering Research conceptual framework and contains trainee materials and detailed facilitator instructions to guide implementation. The curriculum was originally developed for use with trainees across science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medical (STEMM) disciplines engaged in team-based research, and has since been updated and aligned with the Comprehensive Researcher Development Framework (Branchaw, Butz, and Ayoob 2025) for use with developing researchers across disciplines.
Themes and Concepts:
The Comprehensive Researcher Development Framework
The Comprehensive Researcher Development Framework, derived from 56 published, discipline-specific research training frameworks with validity evidence, defines eight areas of researcher development and 79 researcher learning outcomes.
Understand historical and emerging disciplinary content, concepts, frameworks, and theories and how they relate to other disciplines.
Example Knowledge Learning Objectives:
- Know the fundamental content in their discipline (e.g., frameworks, theories, and models).
- Ground hypotheses and research questions in established disciplinary knowledge, theories, frameworks, or observations.
- Know inferences and implications of research findings.
Know and apply disciplinary knowledge, technical, and reasoning skills to conduct research that advances knowledge in the discipline.
Example Skills Learning Objectives:
- Identify gaps in existing knowledge or research results to investigate.
- Follow standard protocols to collect and store research data.
- Formulate hypotheses and research questions that can be systematically tested or investigated.
Follow guidelines for responsible conduct of research and recognize and respond to ethical issues that impact and emerge from conducting research.
Example Ethics Learning Objectives:
- Follow disciplinary data ownership and stewardship practices.
- Act to increase access to research for all.
Translate and communicate research ideas and findings across multiple formats and audiences.
Example COMMUNICATION Learning Objectives
- Construct appropriate methods for presenting and visualizing data. Use disciplinary conventions to communicate research (e.g., ideas, results, implications) orally and in writing.
Build relationships and skills to productively interact and collaborate with people from diverse backgrounds and perspectives in the research environment.
Example INTERPERSONAL Learning Objectives:
- Understand and conduct themselves in accordance with the cultural and social norms of professionals in the discipline.
- Express respect for others’ differences.
- Make meaningful contributions to collaborative research projects.
Develop personal qualities (i.e., curiosity, confidence, identity, self-regulation, self-assessment and perseverance) that are critical for long-term success in research.
Example MINDSET Learning Objectives:
- Persevere when problems or challenges arise in research (e.g., unexpected, ambiguous, or uncertain results, failed projects).
- Develop confidence in their capability to successfully conduct research.
- Engage in practices that support work-life balance (e.g., time management, pursuing interests beyond research).
Apply and translate knowledge and skills as a researcher to identify and pursue a research or research-related career.
Example CAREER Learning Objectives:
- Identify and clarify a long-term strategic vision for their research career.
- Translate and apply their research skills and knowledge across career pathways.
Develop administrative skills to lead research personnel and projects.
Example Leadership Learning Objectives:
- Identify and clarify a long-term strategic vision for their research career.
- Identify and clarify a long-term strategic vision for a program of research.
- Mentor other developing researchers using best practices in mentoring.
Learning Assessment:
The Entering Research Learning Assessment (ERLA)
The Entering Research Learning Assessment (ERLA) was developed to align with the Entering Research conceptual framework. It expands upon the scope of previous undergraduate research assessment tools and includes two surveys: a trainee self-assessment of learning gains and a mentor assessment of trainee learning gains. The parallel surveys measure learning across the seven areas of trainee development and can be used with both undergraduate and graduate trainees and their mentors. Evidence of validity has been published for the entire instrument and for the seven individual scales within each area of trainee development.
Mentor and mentee survey results can be aligned and compared to understand how mentors and mentees agree (or not) on their assessment of the mentee’s learning gains. Review Butz and Branchaw (2020) for evidence of content validity, internal structure validity (confirmatory factor analysis and factor loadings), convergent validity, and internal consistency of the instruments.
The ERLA, along with other research experience assessment and implementation evaluation tools, is available in the Entering Research book. In addition, trained facilitators of Entering Research and our research collaborators are eligible to access online versions of these instruments and aggregate reports of their data free of charge.
MENTOR CURRICULUM: Culturally Aware Mentoring (CAM)
Research shows that culturally heterogeneous teams outperform and out-innovate culturally homogeneous teams, leading to better science. But addressing cultural heterogeneity can be daunting. In recent times, we have been confronted with the difficulties of racial discussions and the legacy of racism in our institutions. Research is not insulated from these dynamics. This CIMER CAM workshop is one effort to enhance effective mentorship to advance inclusive excellence in science (Byars-Winston et al., 2018; Byars-Winston et al., 2026).
Although there are many aspects to cultural diversity, the CIMER CAM workshop focuses on race within the US. Extrapolations can easily be made to other aspects of our identities. Read more about the training.
Themes and Concepts:
- Identify how cultural beliefs, worldviews and identities influence mentoring practices
- Recognize how cultural diversity can impact, complicate, and benefit research mentoring relationships.
- Acknowledge the impact of conscious and unconscious assumptions, privilege, stereotype threat, and biases on the mentor-mentee relationship.
- Apply evidence-based strategies, using case studies, to reduce and counteract the impact of biases, stereotype threat, and privilege, fostering trusting, culturally responsive mentoring relationships.
Clinical Educators Module
CIMER collaborated with colleagues across the country to create a module titled “Fostering Success & Promoting Professional Development of Clinician Educator Mentees: A Workshop for Mentors.” You can find an article about its effectiveness and download all module materials, including the facilitator guide, slides, participant materials and an evaluation form on the MedEd Portal.
Themes and Concepts:
- Define demonstrable markers of progress toward career advancement on the clinician educator track.
- Develop a strategy to guide the professional development of clinician-educator mentees through an individual development plan.
- Prioritize tasks that lead to advancement/promotion.
- Access an enhanced toolbox of resources for mentoring clinician educators.
Collaborate With Us
To inquire about Entering Research collaboration opportunities, please email us.